View Full Version : Casey Anthony HUGE OSU FAN!!
MoellerLover
07-07-2011, 08:59 AM
If any of you have been following the trial you've probably seen the multitude of pics of Casey in OSU gear. I think she represents the fan base entirely and many sighs of relief could be heard in Cbus this week as they found out that one of their own would not have to spend their life in prison. GO BUCKS! GO CASEY ANTHONY!! P.S. NUT you might have a chance of getting laid if you try and date this woman! A lot of people will be scared away but your bond with her in terms of love for the Bucks could see your love through!!!
bluefan
07-07-2011, 09:09 AM
Saw some dumb *unt from the jury on the news this AM. She was defending the despicable verdict by her and her peers by saying that "not guilty" doesn't mean "innocent". Does this stupid bitch realize that Anthony can't be tried for her daughters murder again? "They didn't provide cause of death so we couldn't find guilty". The dumb Anthony *unt failed to tell anybody for weeks about her missing daughter. Fry the stupid bitch. No brainer. Goddamn liberals.
Wolvrin704
07-07-2011, 04:53 PM
She is guilty as the day is long. But I blame the prosecutor for not realizing he had a life sentence murder charge on his hand and not a death penalty murder. He got caught up in the sensationalism and thus overcharged her allowing her to basically skate free and I'm sure in the process rake in huge amounts of money to acenuate her partying life.
rickyleach
07-07-2011, 05:36 PM
another liar from osu.
MoellerLover
07-10-2011, 09:03 PM
She is guilty as the day is long. But I blame the prosecutor for not realizing he had a life sentence murder charge on his hand and not a death penalty murder. He got caught up in the sensationalism and thus overcharged her allowing her to basically skate free and I'm sure in the process rake in huge amounts of money to acenuate her partying life.
I understand your logic here. The degree with which this had to be proven to be beyond a "reasonable doubt" was too severe. It's almost like without an eyewitness or forensics resulting from a quickly discovered corpse what's the point of putting someone on trial? It makes me think evil mothers will go on killing sprees now because it has to be easy to look less guilty than Casey Anthony!!
Wolvrin704
07-10-2011, 09:45 PM
I understand your logic here. The degree with which this had to be proven to be beyond a "reasonable doubt" was too severe. It's almost like without an eyewitness or forensics resulting from a quickly discovered corpse what's the point of putting someone on trial? It makes me think evil mothers will go on killing sprees now because it has to be easy to look less guilty than Casey Anthony!!
Exactly, if you don't have absolutely solid evidence you don't want to go for a death penalty conviction. That said any mothers using that logic are as dumb as the crimes they commit because I imagine that the vast majority of the time the prosecutor does get a conviction.
wolverine
07-14-2011, 06:45 AM
here she is in all her OSU glory
rickyleach
08-07-2011, 04:06 PM
here she is in all her OSU glory
donny said she also has a block o tatoo on her puss...
rickyleach
08-09-2011, 07:56 PM
here she is in all her OSU glory
maybe the ohio state players will wear tatoos for casey
Welding Engineer
08-10-2011, 10:37 AM
Question for you guys, which doctoral candidate won the 1967 Sumner B. Myers Prize recognizing his disertation as being the best one in mathamatics?
hail2mich
08-10-2011, 11:56 AM
Question for you guys, which doctoral candidate won the 1967 Sumner B. Myers Prize recognizing his disertation as being the best one in mathamatics?
I heard he wasn't a big Rich Rod fan. This wasn't the Michigan football he remembered from the 60's dammit!
bluefan
08-10-2011, 01:03 PM
here she is in all her OSU glory
Hey, guys, relax. Everyone kills their own kids, kills your kids, kills my kids...
Wolvrin704
08-10-2011, 02:58 PM
Question for you guys, which doctoral candidate won the 1967 Sumner B. Myers Prize recognizing his disertation as being the best one in mathamatics?
Hey, leave our own skeletons alone! At least our guy actually went to UM. There also another mass murderer who went to UM but I forget the name.
I would consider Anthony to be one of those fringe lunatic fans that Buckeye nation seems to have so many of.
Welding Engineer
08-10-2011, 03:56 PM
Hey, leave our own skeletons alone! At least our guy actually went to UM. There also another mass murderer who went to UM but I forget the name.
I would consider Anthony to be one of those fringe lunatic fans that Buckeye nation seems to have so many of.
I'm not saying she doesn't deserve to be lynched and burn in hell, but after becoming a parent I can understand how one could snap and kill their children, not that it's right. A momentary lapse in judgement after being sleep deprived, financial stress, etc.., I can see how it could happen. That's how kids get killed by their parents, they don't plan it out, kid's ok one minute, second minute the parent goes off the deep end, third minute the kid's dead. I serious doubt she planned out the killing.
Blowing people up through the mail multiple times is just pure heinous evil.
Wolvrin704
08-10-2011, 04:19 PM
Doesn't matter if it was one of the in the moment things or not, the way she covered it up for a month or so and partied leaves no one to pity her. Plus her child was left unburied for over 6 months until someone stumbled on her. Absolutely no pity for her. As a parent and children's pastor I cannot see how someone can kill their child. Sorry but I totally disagree here. It is our job and duty to protect our children, not harm them. It's called self-control.
I do agree that blowing up people is worse, no doubt about it. But one is rotting in jail and one is getting off along with possible monetary gain on top of killing the one she was supposed to protect. Children trust parents without any hesitation, this is how you as a parent return that trust?
UM's other notorious murderer was one H.H. Holmes who did his killing during the 1893 Worlds Fair in Chicago. He confessed to 27 murders and was suspected of at least 4 more. His "Murder Castle" was one ingeniously designed maze. This guy takes the cake for sick individuals.
Welding Engineer
08-11-2011, 10:36 AM
As I implied, I think she should be lynched and sent to her maker for final disposition. I of course don't condone the killing of children. I was stating that I understand how it can happen, disagree with me or not. Perhaps you're a better parent than me but I can relate to wanting to drownd them in the bathtub. However I've never intentionally hurt either of my kids (the ceiling fan came out of nowhere and I didn't realize he would go that high, I swear.)
I never really followed the trial but it didn't seem like they had a whole lot of evidence against her? No clear motive, no murder weapon, no cause of death. All they really had was a soft motive, opportunity, and evidence about rotting flesh in a vehicle that couldn't be replicated. I guess the guilty must go free sometimes to ensure that the innocent also go free.
Over 100 years ago doesn't count for crediting serial killers, falls under the same clause as not getting laid for a defined period of time makes you a virgin.
Wolvrin704
08-11-2011, 12:08 PM
I agree, the prosecution muffed the case. They went for death penalty but didn't have evidence to support it whereas a lesser charge of murder or even manslaughter would have convicted her I'm sure.
I understand what you're saying and I can concede that there are times parents may have certain thoughts, but God forbid they actually carry them out.
Uncle Rico
08-11-2011, 12:47 PM
I was under the assumption that the jury could have found her guilty of many lesser offenses, including child endangerment. It's funny how they found her guilty of lying, but nothing else! Unbelievable. Why would she lie about anything, if she didn't do anything wrong? BTW, she didn't report Caylee missing at all and never was. Her mom did after 31 days. Jury is to blame here!
MoellerLover
08-18-2011, 09:59 AM
Question for you guys, which doctoral candidate won the 1967 Sumner B. Myers Prize recognizing his disertation as being the best one in mathamatics?
Ted Kazinski?
Wolvrin704
08-18-2011, 10:24 AM
Ted Kazinski?
It is. He first went to Harvard and got his undergrad, then went to UM to get his PhD. Being mentally unstable though does not mean one cannot be brilliant in certain scholarly fields. But as I pointed out, we had another skeleton in our closet I would consider even worse.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.0.6 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.